Posts

Approx. 1470: birth of first known Hutsteiner

Approx. 1470: birth of first known Hutsteiner

The first known Hutsteiner is Tameln (or Thomml)- the austro-bavarian pronounciation of ‘Thomas’ – living in Hutstein, Upper Austria. The correct reading of the record is a little bit disputed as other historians interpret it as “Tameln” while I’m interpreting a second record as “Thomml”. Our local dialect spoken nowadays still uses “Thamerl” instead of “Thomas” often.

Tameln is mentioned in the old cadastre document (Urbar) of 1509 and a tax document of 1509 available in the states archive of Austria, Vienna. This also means that he was born approximately 1470, because usually young adult people were awarded with a fief to keep the numbers of changes of owners low. So, Tameln’s age can be estimated at approx. 30-40 years in 1509. 

In fact in this document he is not really designated as ‘Hutsteiner’, as surnames did arise during these times only, but living in the hamlet of Hutstein made him an ‘Hutsteiner’ for sure, or, in a more correct way, a ‘Huetstainer’ in the local dialect.  At this point of time peasants often were called according the place they lived. 

Urbar 1509: Tammln at the Huestain

I would like to emphasize at this point: it does not necessarily mean that all known Hutstein families descended from him – definitely not.

First, it was common in this region that some people who changed their home / living place got the surname derived from the place, location or the name of the farm they occupied. I.e. if Tameln changed his location or farm he got a new surname afterwards. And this could have happened several times. 

This also means that all known Hutsteiner families of the Austro-Bavarian lines do not implicitly be close relatives. They may have their origin in different families but once they lived in Hutstein, they got the surname ‘Huetstainer’ during the formation of surnames, too. And changing the home or living place was as common as nowadays. But as most people in this low populated area are related quite close to each other this is – for sure – the case for the Huetstainer families, too. 

By the way: this changing of surnames according to the living location obviously did stop in the Wegscheid parish district before the 1630s. But there are other areas in Bavaria and Austria where it was common until the 1730s. During my researches I found families, which changed their surname 3 times within a decade during the 1690s. And I could observe surname changes of documented Hutsteiner families, too. Wolfgang Hutsteiner obviously was a born Stölzl family member. For him and some of his children, e.g. Thomas Hutsteiner, this name Stölzl was used, too.

Second, shortly after 1509 there had been two fiefs at Hutstein, one belonging to the dominion of Falkenstein, the other to Rannariedl. 

So, we had two of our family lines at Hutstein: the first one started with Tameln (Thomas) Hutsteiner before 1509 in Rannariedl dominion and probably ended around 1581 with Steffan Hutsteiner, the second one started with Hannsl (Johann) Hutsteiner at least 1537 in Falkenstein dominion and probably ended around 1630 with Zacharias Hutsteiner.  Whether Hannsl on the Falkenstein fief was a descendant of Tameln on the Rannariedl fief or from another family probably never will be clarified, but as the second fief was within another dominion likely it had been another family.

tax document of 1509: Thomml at Huestain

The first BMD records

The first BMD records

The first baptism record 1588

In 1588 Magdalena Hutsteiner was baptised in the parish of Obernzell, lower Bavaria, close to Wegscheid.

This is the very first church record of any Hutsteiner. Unfortunately it does not mention Magdalena’s father in detail.

Magdalena Hutsteiner’s baptism record in parish Obernzell, Bavaria (#3)
The first marriage record 1627

The first marriage record of a Hutsteiner family member is about Thomas Hutsteiner’s first marriage on 27th July 1627 when he married Andreas Krieger’s widow Susanna in the parish of Sarleinsbach.

Thomas Hutsteiner’s marriage record in parish Sarleinsbach, Austria

There is a indirect marriage record of 1544 available, when Lienhard Hutsteiner had to pay a tax to his landlord for his marriage 1539.

I.3.1 Lienhardt Huetstainer

The first death record 1611

The first Hutsteiner death record can be found  again in the parish Sarleinsbach, Upper Austria. Two boys, both named Christoph, died in Mayrhof, Sarleinsbach, on their day of birth 20th October 1611. Both had been “frauengetauft”, i.e. it was an emergency baptism done by a midwife.

the twins Christoph/Christoph Hutsteiner’s death record in parish Sarleinsbach, Austria

I.2 One single place of origin

I.2 One single place of origin

 

Actual research is pinpointing to a single origin of all Hutsteiner/Hutstein families. This origin is located at Hutstein, a small hamlet located in Upper Austria close to the bavarian town of Wegscheid and the austrian hamlet of Vatersreith.

It does not imply that all Hutsteiner/Hutstein are members of one single family. In fact, it is likely that they are descendants of at least two different families with the same surname and a single origin location. And it is also observed that children of other families owning a fifth at Hutstein, e.g. family Stölzl or Aumüllner, were named Hutsteiner later on.

cadastre map of 1860

This hamlet of Hutstein, about 750 m above sea level, had two fiefs, the first of which was under the rule of Rannariedl from 1509, the second to the rule of Falkenstein, which was documented from 1537 on. Both fiefdoms were of the same size.

The very first fiefdom was probably not divided as both were subject to different lords, but a second one was cleared shortly after 1509. Therefore we can assume that two different families sat on these two fiefs, whose descendants later received the surname Hutsteiner, but possibly no direct family relationship existed.

queue of fiefdom holders at Hutstein

 

As the road from next village, Vatersreith,  ends at the southern fief first it can be identified as the Rannariedl’s fief mentioned in the 1509 Urbar. This can be verified by using old church records from Oberkappel which states house numbers compared with an actual map.